First European Securities In Court in February

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

One of the Guests? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

You don't write for that particular journal do you Damon?

That piece goes awfully deep for there not to be a Garg involved.

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

One of the Guests? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Although there does seem to be a number of errors in the piece, it is good that PASOTI has been recognised as the "Official Plymouth Argyle forum"   

Chemical Ali wrote:

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

One of the Guests? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Although there does seem to be a number of errors in the piece, it is good that PASOTI has been recognised as the "Official Plymouth Argyle forum"   

this has ian de lar written all over it lol i wouldnt be shocked if ian walker was him

Is it feck Angry if it was DeLiar it would go something like this,
Firstly I would like to say thank you to James Brent as without him we wouldn't have a club to support. Nik would like to announce there is nothing at all to worry about at FES. Getting any company wound up and liquidated is just a procedure that is followed sometimes when people don't see eye to eye over trifling arguments like who makes the tea or who parks in which car parking space. I did ask Waltham Forest Friendly to provide a statement but they kept on making libellous statements and as such have been banned from the clubs official forum and henceforth cannot be mentioned online.

He did however write this piece for the Herald,
Firstly can we all thank James Brent that we still have a club to support. As sponsor of the magnificent joint venture between Tudor industries ltd and Akkeron asset stripping ltd. Nik Baron would like to say that any fears over his recent court troubles are unfounded, knickers will still be filled with stickers, mugs are free with every fan fest ticket and the Machu Pichu trip is still on. Unfortunately since Kilamanjaro the associate proxy director has put on another five stone and will have to wait at the bottom of the hill.

I am rather suprised that Tudor allows an 'adverse' lender to 'advertise' all over Home Park as this seems somewhat to go against Council Policy................

Iggy wrote:

Is it feck Angry if it was DeLiar it would go something like this,
Firstly I would like to say thank you to James Brent as without him we wouldn't have a club to support. Nik would like to announce there is nothing at all to worry about at FES. Getting any company wound up and liquidated is just a procedure that is followed sometimes when people don't see eye to eye over trifling arguments like who makes the tea or who parks in which car parking space. I did ask Waltham Forest Friendly to provide a statement but they kept on making libellous statements and as such have been banned from the clubs official forum and henceforth cannot be mentioned online.

He did however write this piece for the Herald,
Firstly can we all thank James Brent that we still have a club to support. As sponsor of the magnificent joint venture between Tudor industries ltd and Akkeron asset stripping ltd. Nik Baron would like to say that any fears over his recent court troubles are unfounded, knickers will still be filled with stickers, mugs are free with every fan fest ticket and the Machu Pichu trip is still on. Unfortunately since Kilamanjaro the associate proxy director has put on another five stone and will have to wait at the bottom of the hill.

  

Chemical Ali wrote:

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

One of the Guests? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Although there does seem to be a number of errors in the piece, it is good that PASOTI has been recognised as the "Official Plymouth Argyle forum"   

I noticed that one Ali - The Pig will be torn here. On the one hand he's always claimed his site to not be affiliated. However he knows it will please his paymaster James if the two are officially nicely entwined.    

X-Isle will have a seizure if he reads that piece. Oh how he used to harp on about Pyongyang being properly Independent and what a sad day it would be if PAFC and Pyongyang ever became 'an item'. He won't show any dissent though. It's hilarious because Newell dislikes him almost as much as he does all the other nemisis' he's gathered over the years. Nowt worse than someone you'd love to row with, who now always agrees with ya!  

I'm surprised PL2 FACED and Porky haven't started a sponsor Banton's shirt wankfest, or have they?

Maybe Nikkkk is so skint that he can't stump up enough petty cash for the official PAFC forum   

Greenjock wrote:

I'm surprised PL2 FACED and Porky haven't started a sponsor Banton's shirt wankfest, or have they?

Maybe Nikkkk is so skint that he can't stump up enough petty cash for the official PAFC forum   

Shorely Mods, the link at the bottom of this page should be changed from 'Popcorn Time' to 'Official Plymouth Argyle Forum' ?  

Czarcasm wrote:

Greenjock wrote:

I'm surprised PL2 FACED and Porky haven't started a sponsor Banton's shirt wankfest, or have they?

Maybe Nikkkk is so skint that he can't stump up enough petty cash for the official PAFC forum   

Shorely Mods, the link at the bottom of this page should be changed from 'Popcorn Time' to 'Official Plymouth Argyle Forum' ?  

Strangely the links can only be changed by the Keyholders and Knecht is busy Cardigan modelling.

Charlie Wood wrote:

I guess poor ole Postey is on 24 hour ATD watch. Don't tell 'em your name Pike   

Sadly and pathetically he is. He watches, scans and pours over every conceivable little snippet of ammunition and information he could use for a rainy day. His dossier of quotes, pics and ATD screen shots must getting as big as     Pathetic little man.


Get that De-lar?  

Czarcasm wrote:

I noticed that one Ali - The Pig will be torn here. On the one hand he's always claimed his site to not be affiliated.

Hey Czarky, if you click on About Pasoti at the top of their rather untidy home page, you'll see the words........Pasoti.. an OFFICIAL fan club of PAFC.  I checked this when that forum was tucked under Nik and Nool's pillow some while ago. I have no idea if it was always worded as such, but it certainly is now. I think they are delighted to be official, married, joined at the hip and are shouting it from the rooftops. This is his big lunge, he won't be taking half measures.

Dougie wrote:

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

One of the Guests? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Shame they didn't get a direct quote from the director(s) of FES or the petitioners from Waltham Forest Freindly Society.  Maybe the Herald will be more direct in it's questioning.  It would help to put it to bed for everyone's sake.  As it stands Nikkk says everything is hunky dory so it must be.

Both parties will not comment on a petition at this stage, Dougie - the laws on publishing content on this topic are incredibly strict - and one cannot simply jump to any conclusions with the use of forum 'hearsay'.

IanRedington wrote:

Dougie wrote:

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

One of the Guests? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Shame they didn't get a direct quote from the director(s) of FES or the petitioners from Waltham Forest Freindly Society.  Maybe the Herald will be more direct in it's questioning.  It would help to put it to bed for everyone's sake.  As it stands Nikkk says everything is hunky dory so it must be.

Both parties will not comment on a petition at this stage, Dougie - the laws on publishing content on this topic are incredibly strict - and one cannot simply jump to any conclusions with the use of forum 'hearsay'.

Nick Baron seems quite happy to comment and dismiss the petition.

Btw. Welcome Ian and can I say I used to enjoy your role as "Tricky Dicky" in Eastenders.

green_genie wrote:

IanRedington wrote:

Dougie wrote:

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

One of the Guests? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Shame they didn't get a direct quote from the director(s) of FES or the petitioners from Waltham Forest Freindly Society.  Maybe the Herald will be more direct in it's questioning.  It would help to put it to bed for everyone's sake.  As it stands Nikkk says everything is hunky dory so it must be.

Both parties will not comment on a petition at this stage, Dougie - the laws on publishing content on this topic are incredibly strict - and one cannot simply jump to any conclusions with the use of forum 'hearsay'.

Nick Baron seems quite happy to comment and dismiss the petition.

Btw. Welcome Ian and can I say I used to enjoy your role as "Tricky Dicky" in Eastenders.

his scenes in corrie with jim mcdonald where bafta winning...so they were

Winter Green wrote:

Czarcasm wrote:

I noticed that one Ali - The Pig will be torn here. On the one hand he's always claimed his site to not be affiliated.

Hey Czarky, if you click on About Pasoti at the top of their rather untidy home page, you'll see the words........Pasoti.. an OFFICIAL fan club of PAFC.  I checked this when that forum was tucked under Nik and Nool's pillow some while ago. I have no idea if it was always worded as such, but it certainly is now. I think they are delighted to be official, married, joined at the hip and are shouting it from the rooftops. This is his big lunge, he won't be taking half measures.

Interesting.

What does 'official' actually mean? In years gone by it got to the point where Pasoti was so disliked by those in power at Home Park, that all computers at the ground were blocked from being able to access Pasoti. Peter Jones was a huge critic of the site when dissenting voices were able to air their opinions there. Oh how things change.   

Pasoti was, once upon a time, fiercely Independent. Sadly nowadays it is almost exclusively the domain of nodding donkeys, children, and star-struck yes-men.

Winter Green wrote:

 Hey Czarky, if you click on About Pasoti at the top of their rather untidy home page, you'll see the words........Pasoti.. an OFFICIAL fan club of PAFC.  I checked this when that forum was tucked under Nik and Nool's pillow some while ago. I have no idea if it was always worded as such, but it certainly is now. I think they are delighted to be official, married, joined at the hip and are shouting it from the rooftops. This is his big lunge, he won't be taking half measures.

That page has been up for years and years.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I think they were honoured as an "online' fan club when the internet was in its infancy.  It didn't take too long for it to fall out of favour...  

Now, thanks to Newell, its back as an 'official' propaganda outlet.

IanRedington wrote:

Both parties will not comment on a petition at this stage, Dougie - the laws on publishing content on this topic are incredibly strict - and one cannot simply jump to any conclusions with the use of forum 'hearsay'.

For someone who purports to be an expert in the matter of disclosure our new poster doesn't appear to have much empathy with the English language.

"Both parties will not comment" ?

Shirley one means:- Neither party will comment ?

I smell Pork.

Lord Tisdale wrote:

IanRedington wrote:

Both parties will not comment on a petition at this stage, Dougie - the laws on publishing content on this topic are incredibly strict - and one cannot simply jump to any conclusions with the use of forum 'hearsay'.

For someone who purports to be an expert in the matter of disclosure our new poster doesn't appear to have much empathy with the English language.

"Both parties will not comment" ?

Shirley one means:- Neither party will comment ?

I smell Pork.

You don't half love your sausage, Tis.

PatDunne wrote:

I am rather suprised that Tudor allows an 'adverse' lender to 'advertise' all over Home Park as this seems somewhat to go against Council Policy................

cheeky brown envelope might help or he done it to keep speccy quiet.

Official: Relating to an authority or public body and its activities and responsibilities.

Lord Tisdale wrote:

IanRedington wrote:

Both parties will not comment on a petition at this stage, Dougie - the laws on publishing content on this topic are incredibly strict - and one cannot simply jump to any conclusions with the use of forum 'hearsay'.

For someone who purports to be an expert in the matter of disclosure our new poster doesn't appear to have much empathy with the English language.

"Both parties will not comment" ?

Shirley one means:- Neither party will comment ?

I smell Pork.

You're awfully nice to new posters, aren't you?

Thanks...

IanRedington wrote:

Lord Tisdale wrote:

IanRedington wrote:

Both parties will not comment on a petition at this stage, Dougie - the laws on publishing content on this topic are incredibly strict - and one cannot simply jump to any conclusions with the use of forum 'hearsay'.

For someone who purports to be an expert in the matter of disclosure our new poster doesn't appear to have much empathy with the English language.

"Both parties will not comment" ?

Shirley one means:- Neither party will comment ?

I smell Pork.

You're awfully nice to new posters, aren't you?

Thanks...

I am actually, some on here will be checking out your IP address and inside leg measurement as I type.

While your posting history consists of a pretty lame defence of Nikk the money lender your boney fides are bound to be suspect, this site and the people that post on it have been subject to a tirade of abuse from the Pork Patrol, as an unbiased observer I feel obliged to help them out whenever I can.

May I commend you on your correct use of "you're"?

Lord Tisdale wrote:

IanRedington wrote:

Lord Tisdale wrote:

IanRedington wrote:

Both parties will not comment on a petition at this stage, Dougie - the laws on publishing content on this topic are incredibly strict - and one cannot simply jump to any conclusions with the use of forum 'hearsay'.

For someone who purports to be an expert in the matter of disclosure our new poster doesn't appear to have much empathy with the English language.

"Both parties will not comment" ?

Shirley one means:- Neither party will comment ?

I smell Pork.

You're awfully nice to new posters, aren't you?

Thanks...

I am actually, some on here will be checking out your IP address and inside leg measurement as I type.

While your posting history consists of a pretty lame defence of Nikk the money lender your boney fides are bound to be suspect, this site and the people that post on it have been subject to a tirade of abuse from the Pork Patrol, as an unbiased observer I feel obliged to help them out whenever I can.

May I commend you on your correct use of "you're"?

Defence of Nikk? Please look back at the original post - what I actually did was respond to someone questioning why there were no quotes in an article by a 'Loantalk' journalist from Nikk or WFFS.

Whether you look at my IP address or not - which by the way is completely ludicrous, you represent a small second division football club's fan forum, not the bloody Stasi - I have no commercial interest in this story at all.

But thank you for that, 'Lord Tisdale' - and for the grammatical commendation - may I commend you on being a complete w****r?

Farewell,

Welcome to ATD Ian!