New visual

125+1 wrote:

Right om ready to be lynched.

I actually like it. I think home park will be a nicer place with the grandstand replaced. I think it should be bigger, the club is being screwed out of future growth but I like the design.

Now iF Brent did change the plans and added say an extra 3k but left the rest of the development the same how many would object.

oh thats alright then screw ambition and the future it looks pretty and thats all that matters i guess!!!! jesus wept what a janner thing to say!!!

if it had 3000 more seats or 3000 seats could be added to the stand it wouldn't be an issue but it cant and wont and you know that.

Looks like a plastic non football fan inspired pile of shite, they want to concrete over the park for that! think again property developer we are a football club not a retail village.

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Right om ready to be lynched.

I actually like it. I think home park will be a nicer place with the grandstand replaced. I think it should be bigger, the club is being screwed out of future growth but I like the design.

Now iF Brent did change the plans and added say an extra 3k but left the rest of the development the same how many would object.

oh thats alright then screw ambition and the future it looks pretty and thats all that matters i guess!!!! jesus wept what a janner thing to say!!!

if it had 3000 more seats or 3000 seats could be added to the stand it wouldn't be an issue but it cant and wont and you know that.

Ill split it into points just to help you out as you obviously have difficulty.

1. I like the design. (Positive)
2. The club is being screwed out of future growth.( very negative)
3. If it was bigger would people accept the rest of the development? . (My point to that is at first it was all about the capacity, then all a sudden people started attacking other aspects of HHP.)

So simply put if yhe ground held a decent capacity would the rest of the development be accepted.

Not for me - it can stay at 17,000 for now (need convincing that it could be extended) but the major issue for me is that the revenue from the only asset we have left is not benefiting the football team. Bring the revenue from the 6 retail units in the grandstand to the football club and I may be a little quieter.

This also means that he could be building 25,000 now - I would still be shouting that we have lost our Revenue producing asset.

125+1 wrote:

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Right om ready to be lynched.

I actually like it. I think home park will be a nicer place with the grandstand replaced. I think it should be bigger, the club is being screwed out of future growth but I like the design.

Now iF Brent did change the plans and added say an extra 3k but left the rest of the development the same how many would object.

oh thats alright then screw ambition and the future it looks pretty and thats all that matters i guess!!!! jesus wept what a janner thing to say!!!

if it had 3000 more seats or 3000 seats could be added to the stand it wouldn't be an issue but it cant and wont and you know that.

Ill split it into points just to help you out as you obviously have difficulty.

1. I like the design. (Positive)
2. The club is being screwed out of future growth.( very negative)
3. If it was bigger would people accept the rest of the development? . (My point to that is at first it was all about the capacity, then all a sudden people started attacking other aspects of HHP.)

So simply put if yhe ground held a decent capacity would the rest of the development be accepted.

dont be fatuous, it seems that your trying to pander to both sides instead of having a pair of balls big enough to say you are either for it or not. wishy washy people watched rome burn.

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

Not for me - it can stay at 17,000 for now (need convincing that it could be extended) but the major issue for me is that the revenue from the only asset we have left is not benefiting the football team. Bring the revenue from the 6 retail units in the grandstand to the football club and I may be a little quieter.

Yes with firm evidence that is backed up by independent specialist that are employed by the AFT that states the grandstand can be extended. Not that I don't trust Brent at all....

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

Not for me - it can stay at 17,000 for now (need convincing that it could be extended) but the major issue for me is that the revenue from the only asset we have left is not benefiting the football team. Bring the revenue from the 6 retail units in the grandstand to the football club and I may be a little quieter.

This also means that he could be building 25,000 now - I would still be shouting that we have lost our Revenue producing asset.

Im 1000% with you on that

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

Not for me - it can stay at 17,000 for now (need convincing that it could be extended) but the major issue for me is that the revenue from the only asset we have left is not benefiting the football team. Bring the revenue from the 6 retail units in the grandstand to the football club and I may be a little quieter.

This also means that he could be building 25,000 now - I would still be shouting that we have lost our Revenue producing asset.

Please do not

Yawn !

Same old bitchfest as football fans everywhere look at that and can't believe you lucky feckers get it all, including the free pitch, for nothing yet you still keep bitching.

ps. Nice to see your local paper recognises what really is your cup final.

GOB wrote:

Damon.Lenszner wrote:

Not for me - it can stay at 17,000 for now (need convincing that it could be extended) but the major issue for me is that the revenue from the only asset we have left is not benefiting the football team. Bring the revenue from the 6 retail units in the grandstand to the football club and I may be a little quieter.

Yes with firm evidence that is backed up by independent specialist that are employed by the AFT that states the grandstand can be extended. Not that I don't trust Brent at all....

me too,

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Right om ready to be lynched.

I actually like it. I think home park will be a nicer place with the grandstand replaced. I think it should be bigger, the club is being screwed out of future growth but I like the design.

Now iF Brent did change the plans and added say an extra 3k but left the rest of the development the same how many would object.

oh thats alright then screw ambition and the future it looks pretty and thats all that matters i guess!!!! jesus wept what a janner thing to say!!!

if it had 3000 more seats or 3000 seats could be added to the stand it wouldn't be an issue but it cant and wont and you know that.

Ill split it into points just to help you out as you obviously have difficulty.

1. I like the design. (Positive)
2. The club is being screwed out of future growth.( very negative)
3. If it was bigger would people accept the rest of the development? . (My point to that is at first it was all about the capacity, then all a sudden people started attacking other aspects of HHP.)

So simply put if yhe ground held a decent capacity would the rest of the development be accepted.

dont be fatuous, it seems that your trying to pander to both sides instead of having a pair of balls big enough to say you are either for it or not. wishy washy people watched rome burn.

Its a simple question?

I like the whole development just not the lack of future growth cant see whats so hard to understand.

Lord Tisdale wrote:

Yawn !

Same old bitchfest as football fans everywhere look at that and can't believe you lucky feckers get it all, including the free pitch, for nothing yet you still keep bitching.

ps. Nice to see your local paper recognises what really is your cup final.

I thought you liked it at your atmospheric shithole, its so rustic and quaint.

125+1 wrote:

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Right om ready to be lynched.

I actually like it. I think home park will be a nicer place with the grandstand replaced. I think it should be bigger, the club is being screwed out of future growth but I like the design.

Now iF Brent did change the plans and added say an extra 3k but left the rest of the development the same how many would object.

oh thats alright then screw ambition and the future it looks pretty and thats all that matters i guess!!!! jesus wept what a janner thing to say!!!

if it had 3000 more seats or 3000 seats could be added to the stand it wouldn't be an issue but it cant and wont and you know that.

Ill split it into points just to help you out as you obviously have difficulty.

1. I like the design. (Positive)
2. The club is being screwed out of future growth.( very negative)
3. If it was bigger would people accept the rest of the development? . (My point to that is at first it was all about the capacity, then all a sudden people started attacking other aspects of HHP.)

So simply put if yhe ground held a decent capacity would the rest of the development be accepted.

dont be fatuous, it seems that your trying to pander to both sides instead of having a pair of balls big enough to say you are either for it or not. wishy washy people watched rome burn.

Its a simple question?

I like the whole development just not the lack of future growth cant see whats so hard to understand.

if you bothered to take the pasoti hat off you would know that there is more to the whole development that has flaws other than the stadium so to answer you poor question yes people would still oppose it.

Freathy wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I thought I've seen it somewhere before

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It just needs an arch.

I notice Gillingham are looking to relocate to a bigger, better stadium, but then they have ambitions beyond league 1.

Massive club too.

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Right om ready to be lynched.

I actually like it. I think home park will be a nicer place with the grandstand replaced. I think it should be bigger, the club is being screwed out of future growth but I like the design.

Now iF Brent did change the plans and added say an extra 3k but left the rest of the development the same how many would object.

oh thats alright then screw ambition and the future it looks pretty and thats all that matters i guess!!!! jesus wept what a janner thing to say!!!

if it had 3000 more seats or 3000 seats could be added to the stand it wouldn't be an issue but it cant and wont and you know that.

Ill split it into points just to help you out as you obviously have difficulty.

1. I like the design. (Positive)
2. The club is being screwed out of future growth.( very negative)
3. If it was bigger would people accept the rest of the development? . (My point to that is at first it was all about the capacity, then all a sudden people started attacking other aspects of HHP.)

So simply put if yhe ground held a decent capacity would the rest of the development be accepted.

dont be fatuous, it seems that your trying to pander to both sides instead of having a pair of balls big enough to say you are either for it or not. wishy washy people watched rome burn.

Its a simple question?

I like the whole development just not the lack of future growth cant see whats so hard to understand.

if you bothered to take the pasoti hat off you would know that there is more to the whole development that has flaws other than the stadium so to answer you poor question yes people would still oppose it.

You should change your name to Angry and indecisive.

125+1 wrote:

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Angry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Right om ready to be lynched.

I actually like it. I think home park will be a nicer place with the grandstand replaced. I think it should be bigger, the club is being screwed out of future growth but I like the design.

Now iF Brent did change the plans and added say an extra 3k but left the rest of the development the same how many would object.

oh thats alright then screw ambition and the future it looks pretty and thats all that matters i guess!!!! jesus wept what a janner thing to say!!!

if it had 3000 more seats or 3000 seats could be added to the stand it wouldn't be an issue but it cant and wont and you know that.

Ill split it into points just to help you out as you obviously have difficulty.

1. I like the design. (Positive)
2. The club is being screwed out of future growth.( very negative)
3. If it was bigger would people accept the rest of the development? . (My point to that is at first it was all about the capacity, then all a sudden people started attacking other aspects of HHP.)

So simply put if yhe ground held a decent capacity would the rest of the development be accepted.

dont be fatuous, it seems that your trying to pander to both sides instead of having a pair of balls big enough to say you are either for it or not. wishy washy people watched rome burn.

Its a simple question?

I like the whole development just not the lack of future growth cant see whats so hard to understand.

if you bothered to take the pasoti hat off you would know that there is more to the whole development that has flaws other than the stadium so to answer you poor question yes people would still oppose it.

You should change your name to Angry and indecisive.

and i could change yours to anything i like

besides im not trying to gain favor by being neutral in a two sided debate that's being indecisive.

For Brent, read Ratner - this fiasco is now the worst I've witnessed in 45 year of following this shower!! This episode has been so divisive when it should have been our new beginning - poor show mate!!

125+1 wrote:

Right om ready to be lynched.

I actually like it. I think home park will be a nicer place with the grandstand replaced. I think it should be bigger, the club is being screwed out of future growth but I like the design.

Now iF Brent did change the plans and added say an extra 3k but left the rest of the development the same how many would object.

Whatever happens to the ground the park is no place for a cinema, a hotel or fast food outlets so a big no from me

mcfry wrote:

125+1 wrote:

Right om ready to be lynched.

I actually like it. I think home park will be a nicer place with the grandstand replaced. I think it should be bigger, the club is being screwed out of future growth but I like the design.

Now iF Brent did change the plans and added say an extra 3k but left the rest of the development the same how many would object.

Whatever happens to the ground the park is no place for a cinema, a hotel or fast food outlets so a big no from me

100% agree

I basically don't like Brent making money out of what was the clubs assets without putting f all in and the club being allowed to rot.

Hugh Watt wrote:

I basically don't like Brent making money out of what was the clubs assets without putting f all in and the club being allowed to rot.

That is exactly my point of veiw huge, you would have thought he would have funded a couple of decent signings to keep than fans on side, but he clearly could not give a toss what non superfans think, its all about the bottom line with jimmy and akcon.

Han Solos Other Ship wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

So unrealistic.

Exeter fans seem to have sold out their allocation for starters....

Agree HSOS. CGI presentations are designed to maximize the fluffy effect and draw you into believing you're looking at, and you're getting the best thing since sliced penis. In reality, it'll look feck all like the image. Clever people these marketing spunk-trumpets.