| What we could have! | |
|
+4shonbo Lord Tisdale VillageGreen Tringreen 8 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 12:24 pm | |
| I thought this from the AFT was worthy of it's own thread. - Quote :
- In researching the costs of comparable Grandstands, one that stood out was Hibernian's new 6,400 capacity Grandstand, built a couple of years ago at a cost of £4 million. See here:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
It's also worth having a look at the completed stand: [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 12:36 pm | |
| looks good to me i wouldnt mind that stand.
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 12:37 pm | |
| Petrie also praised the club's financial strength in a challenging time for football and the economy as a whole.
Hibs have made a bottom line profit for five consecutive years and hope the extra capacity will continue to boost revenue.
Real football fans at work at their club. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 12:40 pm | |
| The difference between running a football club how it should be, and treating it as a way of making a quick buck. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 12:50 pm | |
| There's one thing that is really standing out, this is about development and money, not the Club!
Some fans you are Newell, Webb, Jones etc!
|
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 1:41 pm | |
| - GOB wrote:
There's one thing that is really standing out, this is about development and money, not the Club!
Some fans you are Newell, Webb, Jones etc! Indeed. Fail to prepare [inspire with a vision of the future]. Prepare to fail. No doubt Webby will continue to call upon the mahoosive green army to turn up at little HP,down the alleyway , the greatest [or should that be dimmest] fans in the world........... all 6k of them, if this boxed in ministand goes ahead. |
|
| |
VillageGreen
Posts : 6103 Join date : 2012-01-13 Age : 60 Location : Plymouth
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 2:03 pm | |
| - Angry of Mayfair wrote:
- looks good to me i wouldnt mind that stand.
It looks well posh does that stand.. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 2:15 pm | |
| It's all well and good praising that stand but if you look closely you'll notice that the numpties that developed that stand left the bloody school out from the corner |
|
| |
Tringreen
Posts : 10917 Join date : 2011-05-10 Age : 74 Location : Tring
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 2:34 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 2:36 pm | |
| And they also forgot the statue of the greatest auctioneer/internet troll in the history of the internet. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] |
|
| |
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 3:11 pm | |
| [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Uh duh ! This is the new stand and didn't cost £4million, if you boys are going to continue with this ridiculous crusade you might at least get your facts straight. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 3:23 pm | |
| Useful site that is. Anymore news on this from March? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] |
|
| |
shonbo
Posts : 1666 Join date : 2011-12-03 Age : 66
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 3:25 pm | |
| Old news Jock, ain't gonna happen, keep up |
|
| |
125+1
Posts : 591 Join date : 2011-07-02 Location : Plymouth
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 3:38 pm | |
| - GOB wrote:
- I thought this from the AFT was worthy of it's own thread.
- Quote :
- In researching the costs of comparable Grandstands, one that stood out was Hibernian's new 6,400 capacity Grandstand, built a couple of years ago at a cost of £4 million. See here:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
It's also worth having a look at the completed stand: [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] Its is a nice stand, but I think LT is right, 2010 the east stand was to be built, the picture above is 2003! Its a shame as this would be perfect for Home Park |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 3:40 pm | |
| - Lord Tisdale wrote:
- [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Uh duh !
This is the new stand and didn't cost £4million, if you boys are going to continue with this ridiculous crusade you might at least get your facts straight. You may indeed have the correct photo but the cost of the stand was less than £4m - Quote :
grunt
06-01-2011, 10:11 PM
In the clubs accounts at July 2010 the stadium was professionally valued by Jones Lang LaSalle at £18.2m, on the basis of its depreciated replacement cost. Also included in the same accounts was the construction of the new East stand, included at cost of £2.87m. There was also spend committed of £310k (but I don't know for sure if that relates to the further costs of the new stand, but I think it does). The Chairman's Report states that the new stand was built at a cost of approximately £500 per seat. If the stand holds 6000, then that makes the cost about £3m, which ties in with the accounts.
Which gives a valuation of £18m for the stadium, plus a further £3m for the East stand, a total of £21m or thereabouts. This is of course not the cost of the stadium, but an up to date valuation of it. I guess the fact that it is single tier helps... |
|
| |
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 3:49 pm | |
| - Pokesdown wrote:
I guess the fact that it is single tier helps... It certainly does but I am afraid that grunt's post bears little relation to reality, the total cost of the clearance and build went way over the original estimate, although still far less than Usury Brent's Diddy Stand estimate, even bearing in mind that the Hibees did not have to bear the full cost insiders reckon the whole deal added more than £4million to the club's total debt which is now estimated to be over double the club's turnover. Figures, especially reliable ones, are a tad hard to get, possibly something to do with the Directors taking over 10% of the club's total income in bunce. |
|
| |
Argyle Fans' Trust
Posts : 202 Join date : 2013-01-21
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 3:53 pm | |
| Apologies for posting the wrong picture.
It doesn't detract from the fact that a 6,400 capacity stand was built for a fraction of the cost of the proposed new stand at Home Park.
Or, that while Argyle are building a new Grandstand, Tis's lot are looking for a brickie to sort out that wall that collapsed at their away end. |
|
| |
Lord Tisdale
Posts : 3040 Join date : 2011-11-23
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 4:24 pm | |
| - Argyle Fans' Trust wrote:
- Apologies for posting the wrong picture.
It doesn't detract from the fact that a 6,400 capacity stand was built for a fraction of the cost of the proposed new stand at Home Park.
Or, that while Argyle are building a new Grandstand, Tis's lot are looking for a brickie to sort out that wall that collapsed at their away end. What it does detract from is the level of confidence one might have in the ability of the AFT to get summat right. To further that, "Argyle are building a new grandstand"? I rather think the haven't got a pot to piss in Gargs are having a stand built for them by Usury Brent when they couldn't have afforded it themselves in the next hundred years, in fact they wouldn't have a club now if it wasn't for ol' Jimbob brent, so alluding to the fact that ECFC are skint hardly carries much weight. We know who we are, you guys are the ones who need a reality check. Oh, and quit it with the "fraction of the cost" crap, the actual costs of the new East Stand have never been released from anything that looks even slightly like a reliable source while the latest 'good' figures show that the directors of Hibernian took over £500k from a T/O of less than £5million in 2010. Sources close to the club suggest the debt is now over £10million, ie. More than double their T/O, hardly surprising you are using them as your example of best practice, what with your record. ps. Yes I know we are a clusterfook as well, but we are nowhere near as big a clusterfook as you were so stick to the subject. |
|
| |
green_genie
Posts : 1321 Join date : 2013-04-06
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 4:37 pm | |
| Have a look at the time lapse of the Hibs West stand build on link below. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]The similarities between the bottom tier and Phase 1 and the way the second tier is supported would suggest that although not a "modular bolt-on" it could be possible. An expensive possibility only feasible after a trip to the premier league I would venture but possible. What is for sure though, if the access road goes in around the back of Lyndhurst you can forget a similar scheme involving a second tier of sufficient capacity to warrant it's own access. |
|
| |
Freathy
Posts : 7233 Join date : 2011-05-12
| Subject: Re: What we could have! Thu May 16, 2013 7:17 pm | |
| - GOB wrote:
- I thought this from the AFT was worthy of it's own thread.
- Quote :
- In researching the costs of comparable Grandstands, one that stood out was Hibernian's new 6,400 capacity Grandstand, built a couple of years ago at a cost of £4 million. See here:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
It's also worth having a look at the completed stand: [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] If you remove all but the first 5 rows of the upper tier then we have brent's ministand. It will look as f***ing hideous as it is damaging to the clubs long term prospects. BRENT OUT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: What we could have! | |
| |
|
| |
| What we could have! | |
|