I've seen some stupid things get written about Argyle lately, some people backing Fletcher and Brent, some thinking they are a combination of the devil and his son, but one of the silliest came while I was reading loads of posts on Pasoti about yesterday and our situation in general, where someone said they are excited about the future!
Now I know there are people on here who say that Brent's plan is for us to get relegated, which I don't give a second thought to, it's just ridiculous, but excited about the future? Now that is cloud cuckoo land.
Even the harshest critics know that after administration it was always going to be a difficult task to turn the club around and get us moving up again, but James Brent backed Fletcher to do this, calling him an exceptional person or words to that effect. Fletcher, according to Brent has been given a competetive budget, which should be enough to think about promotion, and we're languishing near the bottom of the bottom league again. One year on from Brent taking over and we are really no further forward at all.
Fletcher was given the vote of confidence by Brent and the funds to show what he could do, and what has he done? Yesterday we played with Nick Chadwick and Warren Feeney up front. Feeney has at least scored 3 goals this season, even if 2 were penalties, and Chadwick has scored 1 goal all season. 1 goal? From an experienced striker?
Fletcher had the chance to ship out these two before the season started, or after watching the pre-season shit that Argyle were producing. 5-0 defeat to Yeovil with Chadwick sent off should have been enough to start the alarm bells ringing surely?
Did Fletcher think that Warren Feeney was suddenly going to become a prolific striker ? Warren Feeney has more yellow cards in his Argyle career than goals!
So instead of trying to offload these two, Fletcher signs a 32 year old from non-league, where admittedly he was prolific, but with no experience of professional football at all. If we had a decent goalscorer and a couple of young prospects I can see that this would've been worth a go, but since signing Griffiths, he has started 4 games.
Since signing Griffiths Fletcher has signed two strikers on loan as well, and leaves them on the bench to play Chadwick and Feeney
I just don't understand Fletcher's logic at all. He has tried Feeney, Chadwick, Griffiths, Macdonald, Lecointe, Madjo, PCH and even Curtis Nelson up front! Jared Sims has had a run out as well and so far we have PCH with 4 goals, Griffiths and Feeney with 3 goals, both have 2 from penalties, Madjo with 3 and Chadwick and Macdonald with 1 each.
Chadwick hasn't scored since playing against Pompeys kids on 14th August, Lecointe has yet to score at all.
I can't be bothered looking at the different combinations Fletcher has used this season, but to me it looks like he tries things in desperation. There is no rhyme or reason behind his thinking. None of these strikers could feel confident about being on the team sheet for the next game, or know for sure that they definitely wouldn't be playing.
Maybe Fletcher studies astrology and chooses them depending on what their star sign says?
This isn't a new problem. Last season Walton was our top scorer with about 8 goals, and again most of these were penalties.
So what is the plan? You see the odd person sticking up for Fletcher saying he's got a young team building for the future. Really? Rhys Griffiths, Nick Chadwick and Warren Feeney are promising up and coming players are they? Or building for the future by borrowing Madjo and Macdonald from other clubs?
Purse, Blanchard, Lowry, Chadwick, Feeney, Williams, both Rhys and Scott Griffiths, Bhasera, Wotton, Cole and Gilmartin are not 18 year olds, so the kids argument is ludicrous, and anyway Fletcher had the chance to do something about this at the start of the season. From yesterday's startin XI only Gilmartin, Lowry and PCH were not at the club last season.
There has been no progress to me, nothing much has changed since last winter and Fletcher has run out of ideas so he relies on Chadwick and Feeney to fire the goals to turn our season around?
If we were told at the beginning of the season that Fletcher was going to be given a couple of years in charge and it would be a slow process but that the plan was to start from scratch and build a team around some promising players like Berry and Hourihane, with youngsters like Lecointe, Sims and Harvey being given the opportunity to play games or something then it would be fair enough and fans could have decided whether they wanted to purchase a season ticket knowing what the plan was.
This didn't happen at all. If Wotton was fit yesterday he would have played instead of Young or Hourihane.
James Brent specifically said that the budget given to Fletcher was enough to get us promoted, raising expectation, we even had the club president making his "If you want a new striker" speech again.
Now we are 18 games into the season, have won 4 times, and are already looking nervously at the few teams below us, watching for Aldershot and Barnet's results again. Our disciplinary record is slipping back to like last seasons where red and yellow cards are handed out like confetti and the manager insists that he has no problem with this
James Brent must realise that Fletcher has not got a clue. He is throwing so many darts that every now and again he will get lucky, but it will be that, luck.
There are 28 games left this season. Under Fletcher at this rate we will probably win 6 more games and will be involved in a relegation battle right to the end of the season.
If Brent acts now then a new manager and team of coaching staff have enough time to sort out the mess and get us out of trouble this season, and all along have next season in mind. And it has to be a new manager with a team, not Paul Wotton or Darren Purse as a cheap option, but an experienced manager with a backroom team.
If James Brent is unwilling to fund this then he should say so now, because nobody believes him anymore when he says Carl Fletcher is exceptional. He should be preparing a statement either sacking Fletcher or giving details of why he can't afford to sack him, then fans can make their minds up about paying to watch the shit.
If we lose on Tuesday, and we are big favourites to lose, then I cannot see how there will be any more than 5000 fans there to watch the Chesterfield game on Saturday. They can count season ticket holders who don't bother showing up all they like but it will not mask the large areas of empty seats.
If 6300 is around 2k below what has been budgeted for, then try 5300 or even 4800 because that's what will happen unless major changes are made.