Rickler, have you ever..?

Christ Cerbs, we've got two poodles posting on here just to stir the shit and you look to be in cahoots with them, have you no respect for this site.

To me the comment seems to be saying that pilgrim_pete would get Mr Newell to do the hacking not that he did it himself. The former is apparently a statement of fact, judging by the flickr account. The latter would be a serious and unacceptable allegation if that was what had been said.

Perhaps, GreatWestern would clarify?

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Rickler wrote:

Cerbera wrote:

Agree with you pp.

Bit out of order, what will the mods do I wonder?

This is exactly why you should never ever be a mod. Your judgement on issues is bewildering.

How the hell can it be libel?

Greatwestern implied that I worked with Ian Newell to hack your account.

I don't know what/if Ian did anything, but I was involved in no way shape or form. THAT is why it is libel and would like it removed.

No i didn't get your facts right sean ffs

Typical! You wait bloody ages for a mod to arrive and then two come along together!!!

Oh dear.

knecht wrote:

To me the comment seems to be saying that pilgrim_pete would get Mr Newell to do the hacking not that he did it himself. The former is apparently a statement of fact, judging by the flickr account. The latter would be a serious and unacceptable allegation if that was what had been said.

Perhaps, GreatWestern would clarify?

yes thats what i ment

47815greatwestern wrote:

knecht wrote:

To me the comment seems to be saying that pilgrim_pete would get Mr Newell to do the hacking not that he did it himself. The former is apparently a statement of fact, judging by the flickr account. The latter would be a serious and unacceptable allegation if that was what had been said.

Perhaps, GreatWestern would clarify?

yes thats what i ment

Thank you.

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Rickler wrote:

Cerbera wrote:

Agree with you pp.

Bit out of order, what will the mods do I wonder?

This is exactly why you should never ever be a mod. Your judgement on issues is bewildering.

How the hell can it be libel?

Greatwestern implied that I worked with Ian Newell to hack your account.

I don't know what/if Ian did anything, but I was involved in no way shape or form. THAT is why it is libel and would like it removed.

and your gonna remove it are you ?

Charlie Wood wrote:

Christ Cerbs, we've got two poodles posting on here just to stir the shit and you look to be in cahoots with them, have you no respect for this site.

What is that supposed to mean?
My opinion not valid unless it tows the ATD party line? When did that become part of the site rules?

Free speech Charlie, within the bounds of decency you said. Please clarify where I have overstepped .!

Sorry Charlie, but this is not stirring.

This is EXACTLY the treatment Rickler/Tring gave Chris, Ian, Pasoti mods etc etc and that most on here lapped up.

The shoe is on the other foot now. Rickler still to answer my question.. You've been 'anging around the president too long

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

47815greatwestern wrote:

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Rickler wrote:

Cerbera wrote:

Agree with you pp.

Bit out of order, what will the mods do I wonder?

This is exactly why you should never ever be a mod. Your judgement on issues is bewildering.

How the hell can it be libel?

Greatwestern implied that I worked with Ian Newell to hack your account.

I don't know what/if Ian did anything, but I was involved in no way shape or form. THAT is why it is libel and would like it removed.

and your gonna remove it are you ?

No, I'm not a mod. At least I don't think I am.. Who knows!!!

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Sorry Charlie, but this is not stirring.

This is EXACTLY the treatment Rickler/Tring gave Chris, Ian, Pasoti mods etc etc and that most on here lapped up.

The shoe is on the other foot now. Rickler still to answer my question.. You've been 'anging around the president too long

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

slander remove it

pilgrim_pete wrote:

47815greatwestern wrote:

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Rickler wrote:

Cerbera wrote:

Agree with you pp.

Bit out of order, what will the mods do I wonder?

This is exactly why you should never ever be a mod. Your judgement on issues is bewildering.

How the hell can it be libel?

Greatwestern implied that I worked with Ian Newell to hack your account.

I don't know what/if Ian did anything, but I was involved in no way shape or form. THAT is why it is libel and would like it removed.

and your gonna remove it are you ?

No, I'm not a mod. At least I don't think I am.. Who knows!!!

then shut up about it then, go blow newell

47815greatwestern wrote:

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Sorry Charlie, but this is not stirring.

This is EXACTLY the treatment Rickler/Tring gave Chris, Ian, Pasoti mods etc etc and that most on here lapped up.

The shoe is on the other foot now. Rickler still to answer my question.. You've been 'anging around the president too long

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

slander remove it

Just for clarification here, slander is spoken. Libel is written.

Cerbera wrote:

47815greatwestern wrote:

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Sorry Charlie, but this is not stirring.

This is EXACTLY the treatment Rickler/Tring gave Chris, Ian, Pasoti mods etc etc and that most on here lapped up.

The shoe is on the other foot now. Rickler still to answer my question.. You've been 'anging around the president too long

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

slander remove it

Just for clarification here, slander is spoken. Libel is written.

meh i doubt the little gimp knows the difference

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

They seem to be in demand right now, you could even go halfs with Newell

Yea Man wrote:

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

They seem to be in demand right now, you could even go halfs with Newell

look out yea man
Sean I know chris webb personally rapson might ask you to remove it

Cerbera wrote:

Charlie Wood wrote:

Christ Cerbs, we've got two poodles posting on here just to stir the shit and you look to be in cahoots with them, have you no respect for this site.

What is that supposed to mean?
My opinion not valid unless it tows the ATD party line? When did that become part of the site rules?

Free speech Charlie, within the bounds of decency you said. Please clarify where I have overstepped .!

Cerbs, I would hope that we know each other well enough to respect each other, even if we are aquaintances rather than mates. To a great extent you have provoked the debate that is currently raging. PP and Leigh are well established Pasoti posters who have only made occasional appearences on this site but now they see the opportunity to make mischief and consequently damage this site they are making merry. You have greatly contributed to making this site what it is and it disappoints me that you seem to be encouraging them in their endeavours.

47815greatwestern wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

They seem to be in demand right now, you could even go halfs with Newell

look out yea man
Sean I know chris webb personally rapson might ask you to remove it

Jealous, are we? Bless you.

pilgrim_pete wrote:

47815greatwestern wrote:

Yea Man wrote:

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

They seem to be in demand right now, you could even go halfs with Newell

look out yea man
Sean I know chris webb personally rapson might ask you to remove it

Jealous, are we? Bless you.

why would i be jealous of you ?

can't help the fact your one of his poodles

Charlie,

I have done nothing wrong. I am merely expressing an opinion.

Last time I checked, there was no restrictions on that in the constitution. Or has that been rewritten too?

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Sorry Charlie, but this is not stirring.

This is EXACTLY the treatment Rickler/Tring gave Chris, Ian, Pasoti mods etc etc and that most on here lapped up.

The shoe is on the other foot now. Rickler still to answer my question.. You've been 'anging around the president too long

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

Perhaps Yea Man can recomend one Rickler uses? He's bound to come across them in his job.

This thread would actually be good if not for greatwestern. Really has no idea.

I agree Bruv.

Oh shit I mean err.

47815greatwestern wrote:

Cerbera wrote:

47815greatwestern wrote:

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Sorry Charlie, but this is not stirring.

This is EXACTLY the treatment Rickler/Tring gave Chris, Ian, Pasoti mods etc etc and that most on here lapped up.

The shoe is on the other foot now. Rickler still to answer my question.. You've been 'anging around the president too long

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

slander remove it

Just for clarification here, slander is spoken. Libel is written.

meh i doubt the little gimp knows the difference

I would imagine Sean knows significantly more than you judging by your poor gramar and spelling pal.

Mrrapson wrote:

47815greatwestern wrote:

Cerbera wrote:

47815greatwestern wrote:

pilgrim_pete wrote:

Sorry Charlie, but this is not stirring.

This is EXACTLY the treatment Rickler/Tring gave Chris, Ian, Pasoti mods etc etc and that most on here lapped up.

The shoe is on the other foot now. Rickler still to answer my question.. You've been 'anging around the president too long

Yea man.. A lawyer.. Where do I buy one of those?

slander remove it

Just for clarification here, slander is spoken. Libel is written.

meh i doubt the little gimp knows the difference

I would imagine Sean knows significantly more than you judging by your poor gramar and spelling pal.

Just to be an annoying little pedantic sh#t, you spelt grammar wrong....