Hull v Plymouth Argyle

I'd be amazed if we get anything from this bar chips and mushy peas on the side.

akagreengull wrote:

Tony Cannan just called Michael Cooper, George Cooper when discussing the goalie performance, he is rubbish as a summariser.

why is he doing it i want to know he knows jack shit.

I wonder if he knows who Gary Nelson was

ive turn on the hull's comms now for a guy who was once a pro wrestler his ability to talk up a match is shite lol

The summariser is our very own Steel Cannaan from the Trust.

Earwegoagain wrote:

The summariser is our very own Steel Cannaan from the Trust.

i know
radio comms its not his strong point this like nouble trying to be a target man. Telford needs to be brought on.

WHY is he taking hardie off and not nouble!!! am i watching the same game as everyone else? he hasnt been amazing i agree but nouble has been worse.

Argo much more dangerous since George Cooper came on for Opoku.

FT Hull 1 Argyle 0

cant argue with this result hull defended strong closing us down very well and we just couldn't break them down. We played well and look comfortable and in the second half Going more attack mode with Cooper coming on helped us greatly but in the end luck just wasnt on our side.
We can take pride in the fact we went down fighting and didnt roll over and kept it at 1-0 and didnt give up for an equalizer as in the old days of league one going 1-0 down would have meant losing by 2-3 more by full time.

my man of the match was Camara as he worked his socks of from start to finish winning the ball of hull players and try to start new attack plays off.

Nouble's role needs explaining to me as he was useless today only weak link imo.

I thought we did ok, apart from the result of course, I think Lowe has something to build on here from this game.

Never going to score and never going to win, that about covers it.

Hardie wasn’t at it today, Nouble not brilliant but some of his hold up play got us going at times.

I recall some of the negativity on here when we beat Blackpool, today’s game was similar in reverse, we were Blackpool in the second half.

Lots to build on I think.

Agree.

Graiser wrote:

Hardie wasn’t at it today, Nouble not brilliant but some of his hold up play got us going at times.

I recall some of the negativity on here when we beat Blackpool, today’s game was similar in reverse, we were Blackpool in the second half.  

Lots to build on I think.

Both games were identical in that the team that got the early goal won. We were lucky not to lose the Blackpool game four nil. Today we looked tighter but didn't threaten much at all and you could see that Hull had what it took to get another if needed. The only thing we can build on is recruiting a much more talented squad then we will be able to match Hull and Blackpool, I personally think we will do ok this season but we are poles apart from teams like these.

Let the fans back in.

Graiser wrote:

Hardie wasn’t at it today, Nouble not brilliant but some of his hold up play got us going at times.

I recall some of the negativity on here when we beat Blackpool, today’s game was similar in reverse, we were Blackpool in the second half.  

Lots to build on I think.

Hardie was just as bad today don't get me wrong but Nouble was worse imo and i would have taken him off instead. Not that Hardie and Telford would have broken that iron curtain to be fair.
Can't wait for Jephcott to return and hopefully hit the ground running.

Nouble is a good ball holder...allowing others to come up field to turn defence into attack....he held defenders at bay....a good ball retainer.

Frank Scrotum Nouble

Thought they missed McLeod in front of the back 3

zyph wrote:

Nouble is a good ball holder...allowing others to come up field to turn defence into attack....he held defenders at bay....a good ball retainer.

didnt do that much yesterday from what i saw just him shadowing hardie and hardie having to do that job and him not getting into position to make good. Go back and watch the first half he did that several times.

he is no mickey evans thats for sure.

I hate predicting a loss for Argyle but I just didn’t see them winning yesterday.

Angry wrote:

zyph wrote:

Nouble is a good ball holder...allowing others to come up field to turn defence into attack....he held defenders at bay....a good ball retainer.

didnt do that much yesterday from what i saw just him shadowing hardie and hardie having to do that job and him not getting into position to make good. Go back and watch the first half he did that several times.

he is no mickey evans thats for sure.

So how come he had joint second highest match rating for the game yesterday....with his strength and holding up of the ball emphasized.

zyph wrote:

Angry wrote:

zyph wrote:

Nouble is a good ball holder...allowing others to come up field to turn defence into attack....he held defenders at bay....a good ball retainer.

didnt do that much yesterday from what i saw just him shadowing hardie and hardie having to do that job and him not getting into position to make good. Go back and watch the first half he did that several times.

he is no mickey evans thats for sure.

So how come he had joint second highest match rating for the game yesterday....with his strength and holding up of the ball emphasized.

thats questionable to me as there were several who did alot better and moore like mayor, G cooper when he came on and camara for 3. he held the ball up yet had no clue who was a round to play on or he was literally shadowing Hardie who had the entire defence on him.

Angry wrote:

akagreengull wrote:

Tony Cannan just called Michael Cooper, George Cooper when discussing the goalie performance, he is rubbish as a summariser.

why is he doing it i want to know he knows jack shit.

Thanks for the 'constructive' feedback. Nice. Having two people on the pitch with the same surname, sometimes there is a slip, but I should just hang for that, right? And it's actually when I was discussing George that I said Michael as we were discussing the left side and I did actually correct myself as I knew I'd slipped, which you'll have heard if you listened properly.