Pasoti Statement...

Lol...


http://www.pasoti.co.uk/talk/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=100876

Hilarious, character assassination, Newell playing the victim again, feck off Newell.

Save going over

A few days ago we lost a long serving and valued Moderator due to the fact he posted an ill thought out comment.
As you can imagine all of the Site Admin are gutted by this.

What was interesting though was almost all of the objectors, containing some whom we believe are banned posters using different usernames and some of whom have not posted here for many many months, came on collectively and complained in the strongest terms about Andy's single comment.

These same posters use Free Chat and ATD regularly where vile comments, character assassination and insults are made daily and nothing is done about them and are left unmoderated.

With this in mind, perhaps you can forgive the Site Admin of Pasoti to suspect that there is a long term and sustained campaign from the sites concerned.

We realise that many Pasoti posters do not want to read about such nonsense but sometimes we feel the need to have our say.

Maybe a previously banned poster posing under a different username who hasn't posted on there in month's could stick a link to the story so far under the statement?

Big LOL.

From what I remember there weren't any ATD posters who complained on Pasoti.

Oh and the amusing thing is Pasoti are once again breaching the data protection laws by not hard deleting user accounts. The site owner has openly stated they only deactivate accounts they do not delete....well the data protection act states personal information should only be stored for as long as necessary

LMFAO. Oh woe is me.    That's actually quite pathetic. Too late Newell. Your quest for world domination is over. Your forum is finished, and your AAA pass and parking space is soon to be revoked.

Newell and his rattled baconsised warriors canvasing for the sympathy vote and playing the victim, again.

He does this every time he has his fat porcine arse handed to him on a plate.

Remember the pig that cried wolf?

Does he honestly think we believe Angry Andy has been booted? Not a chance. Soper's been given his pick of the many multi names available to carry posting as normal as if nothing has chapped. Guaranteed.

What an utterly despicable, and dying website Pispoti has become. Oh how we laugh our tits off. I dread to think how sleepless De-Liar is now knowing his forum manager days are numbered. Actually , WTF is a 'forum manager' anyway? FFS.


Oh, what's that? A knock on my front door?

Shorely paving a return for upside down Andy.....poor thing

The Farm wrote:

Free Chat and ATD ... where vile comments, character assassination and insults are made daily and nothing is done about them and are left unmoderated.

Bollocks. The only example you could come up with from Freechat was something posted nearly a year (A YEAR) ago, which was deleted soon afterwards.

Vile comments, character assassination and insults? Where could anybody have learned that from, eh? Who was it who paid somebody to set up a spoof website so you could call people junkies, paedophiles and whores? Who was it who was caught out sending tweets calling me a witch? Who calls people freaks and weirdos while keeping dossiers including all sorts of private information on them? Who sent a white feather to a man who was dying of cancer (RIP Thai Green) and, when challenged about it, said he deserved it?

The Farm wrote:

With this in mind, perhaps you can forgive the Site Admin of Pasoti to suspect that there is a long term and sustained campaign from the sites concerned.

Correction:

Quote :

With this in mind, perhaps you can forgive Ian Newell for running scared now his long term and sustained campaign of bullying, control freakery and toadying is coming to an end and more and more people can see him for what he is

The Farm wrote:

We realise that many Pasoti posters do not want to read about such nonsense but sometimes we feel the need to have our say.

Correction:

Quote :

We realise that many Pasoti posters might be shocked at some of the things they're learning (at last) so the owner of Pasoti is fighting a desperate rearguard action in hopes of keeping his seat in the directors' box

And while I'm at it

Farm Controller wrote:

Would all users please note, this site never deletes accounts, we simply de-activate them.

This stops the phenomena of 'internet martyrdom' i.e going off in a blaze of glory and them sneaking back with a different username.

You'd be amazed how many times that's happened in the last few years.

Correction:

Quote :

Would all users please note, this site never deletes accounts, we simply de-activate them.

This enables us to take a look at their PMs and breach the Data Protection Act by storing their data, including their email and IP addresses, just in case we find need of it.

You'd be amazed how many times that's happened in the last few years.

Chickens. Coming. Home. To. Roost. Big time.

Peggy wrote:

The Farm wrote:

Free Chat and ATD ... where vile comments, character assassination and insults are made daily and nothing is done about them and are left unmoderated.

Bollocks. The only example you could come up with from Freechat was something posted nearly a year (A YEAR) ago, which was deleted soon afterwards.

Vile comments, character assassination and insults? Where could anybody have learned that from, eh? Who was it who paid somebody to set up a spoof website so you could call people junkies, paedophiles and whores? Who was it who was caught out sending tweets calling me a witch? Who calls people freaks and weirdos while keeping dossiers including all sorts of private information on them? Who sent a white feather to a man who was dying of cancer (RIP Thai Green) and, when challenged about it, said he deserved it?

The Farm wrote:

With this in mind, perhaps you can forgive the Site Admin of Pasoti to suspect that there is a long term and sustained campaign from the sites concerned.

Correction:

Quote :

With this in mind, perhaps you can forgive Ian Newell for running scared now his long term and sustained campaign of bullying, control freakery and toadying is coming to an end and more and more people can see him for what he is

The Farm wrote:

We realise that many Pasoti posters do not want to read about such nonsense but sometimes we feel the need to have our say.

Correction:

Quote :

We realise that many Pasoti posters might be shocked at some of the things they're learning (at last) so the owner of Pasoti is fighting a desperate rearguard action in hopes of keeping his seat in the directors' box

And while I'm at it

Farm Controller wrote:

Would all users please note, this site never deletes accounts, we simply de-activate them.

This stops the phenomena of 'internet martyrdom' i.e going off in a blaze of glory and them sneaking back with a different username.

You'd be amazed how many times that's happened in the last few years.

Correction:

Quote :

Would all users please note, this site never deletes accounts, we simply de-activate them.

This enables us to take a look at their PMs and breach the Data Protection Act by storing their data, including their email and IP addresses, just in case we find need of it.

You'd be amazed how many times that's happened in the last few years.

Chickens. Coming. Home. To. Roost. Big time.

Lorra lorra guests on chuck

No responsibility for Soper's own words whatsoever, or recognition of Pasoti's regular posting contributers disgust at the comment!

Everything is down to those nasty 'dark' forces that seek to wage a "campaign" against Pasoti.

Talk about paranoia...   Can you say "complete denial" Nool?

http://captiongenerator.com/683252/Statement-From-Pasoti-Admin

more in tune with the running of that place

Tgwu wrote:

Save going over

A few days ago we lost a long serving and valued Moderator due to the fact he posted an ill thought out comment.
As you can imagine all of the Site Admin are gutted by this.

What was interesting though was almost all of the objectors, containing some whom we believe are banned posters using different usernames and some of whom have not posted here for many many months, came on collectively and complained in the strongest terms about Andy's single comment.

These same posters use Free Chat and ATD regularly where vile comments, character assassination and insults are made daily and nothing is done about them and are left unmoderated.

With this in mind, perhaps you can forgive the Site Admin of Pasoti to suspect that there is a long term and sustained campaign from the sites concerned.

We realise that many Pasoti posters do not want to read about such nonsense but sometimes we feel the need to have our say.

Tonight I have been on the piss and watched a great blues band but this post is cool, TGUW whoever you are, nice one


Edits cos I'm shitfaced....

Gotta love the diverse, thoroughly un-orchestrated responses from these random pasoti members

LOl.  You'd think they'd drafted the Magna Carta or the Declaration of Independence or something...

Soper wasn't respected. He was a laughing stock.

On another thread Nool took great delight in telling everyone how great the mods were at spotting previously banned posters and vile infiltrators and yet now a bunch of them have all posted on the same thread all within an hour of each other without being detected.

What is the Pasoti obsession with not allowing people to rejoin with a different username?

Les Miserable wrote:

Gotta love the diverse, thoroughly un-orchestrated responses from these random pasoti members

Why do the mods need to reply agreed? Surely they all agreed with the statement in the first place.

That thread is beyond contempt. Staggering and spectacular own goal hard to imagine anyone could be that stupid

Les Miserable wrote:

Gotta love the diverse, thoroughly un-orchestrated responses from these random pasoti members

Looks like a response straight out of North Korea or more likely North Prospect.

A few things, apart from those already mentioned on here ( and btw Peggy - great post!)

Does anyone have screenshots of the original thread where people complained about Soper? Because I'm bloody certain they were all long-standing pasoti users.

If, as the Porkmeister is claiming, the people complaining about Soper were previously banned posters, why aren't they showing in the 'banned users' section now? If Porky knows who they are, then surely he'll have them booted and publicly named and shamed.

No mention of the fact that what Soper said was so vile and depraved that he should have been removed as a mod even if no-one had complained.

Homeslice wrote:

A few things, apart from those already mentioned on here ( and btw Peggy - great post!)

Does anyone have screenshots of the original thread where people complained about Soper? Because I'm bloody certain they were all long-standing pasoti users.

If, as the Porkmeister is claiming, the people complaining about Soper were previously banned posters, why aren't they showing in the 'banned users' section now? If Porky knows who they are, then surely he'll have them booted and publicly named and shamed.

No mention of the fact that what Soper said was so vile and depraved that he should have been removed as a mod even if no-one had complained.

Homeslice give the guy a break. He must be close to a nervous breakdown

harvetheslayer wrote:

Homeslice wrote:

A few things, apart from those already mentioned on here ( and btw Peggy - great post!)

Does anyone have screenshots of the original thread where people complained about Soper? Because I'm bloody certain they were all long-standing pasoti users.

If, as the Porkmeister is claiming, the people complaining about Soper were previously banned posters, why aren't they showing in the 'banned users' section now? If Porky knows who they are, then surely he'll have them booted and publicly named and shamed.

No mention of the fact that what Soper said was so vile and depraved that he should have been removed as a mod even if no-one had complained.

Homeslice give the guy a break. He must be close to a nervous breakdown

I forgot to add, as Site Owner, he's personally liable for any breaches of Data Protection that Pasoti is committing.

I'll leave him alone now, Harve. That's plenty

Homeslice wrote:

harvetheslayer wrote:

Homeslice wrote:

A few things, apart from those already mentioned on here ( and btw Peggy - great post!)

Does anyone have screenshots of the original thread where people complained about Soper? Because I'm bloody certain they were all long-standing pasoti users.

If, as the Porkmeister is claiming, the people complaining about Soper were previously banned posters, why aren't they showing in the 'banned users' section now? If Porky knows who they are, then surely he'll have them booted and publicly named and shamed.

No mention of the fact that what Soper said was so vile and depraved that he should have been removed as a mod even if no-one had complained.

Homeslice give the guy a break. He must be close to a nervous breakdown

I forgot to add, as Site Owner, he's personally liable for any breaches of Data Protection that Pasoti is committing.

I'll leave him alone now, Harve. That's plenty

He's claiming this morning in response to 3 posters that doesnt need to comply with data protection as its non profit website...no idea on that one