Bickering

Graiser wrote:

beesrus wrote:

Tiger and greaser just cranking up their usual " the boss knows best " routine. Just salute the flag when it's raised up at the house.

Basra, I think Derek's track record on signings speaks for itself, so by all means you can keep to your agenda and I'll just stick to the facts if that's ok with you old bean.

Well, that's you told isn't it beesrus. Your opinions are just an agenda while graiser's are, apparently, facts. The arrogance of that statement.

The irony of graiser accusing others of having an agenda on a thread where, yet again, we've seen the same three posters flooding the thread (over 1/4 posts on this thread so far) as a team to defend their view. Which they are entitled to do, but FFS don't then accuse others of having an agenda.

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

beesrus wrote:

Tiger and greaser just cranking up their usual " the boss knows best " routine. Just salute the flag when it's raised up at the house.

Basra, I think Derek's track record on signings speaks for itself, so by all means you can keep to your agenda and I'll just stick to the facts if that's ok with you old bean.

Well, that's you told isn't it beesrus. Your opinions are just an agenda while graiser's are, apparently, facts. The arrogance of that statement.

The irony of graiser accusing others of having an agenda on a thread where, yet again, we've seen the same three posters flooding the thread (over 1/4 posts on this thread so far) as a team to defend their view. Which they are entitled to do, but FFS don't then accuse others of having an agenda.

Been on your hols mousey - was wondering where you had got to. I've brushed off my certificate in stats and had a look. So young graiser, me and + 1 (aka?) = 9 posts = 3 each. (Now you can see how I got a certificate for stats ) That figure is 'taking over the thread''  However, if you add together SS68 and Beesrus and you = 9 posts = 3 each. Now in my day at school (approved) 3 = 3 and 9 = 9. Hmmm?? There is ample evidence that DA does, in general, get his t/f activity correct and that is backed up by the fact we got promoted. Those fans who wrote off GC, JJ, Foxy, Sonny as ''rejects'' are possibly still wiping the egg from their face. I mean your team mate SS68, who has helped you flood the thread with 9 in total, thought 3 of those 4 were rejects when they arrived. Well, if they were then lets get more rejects. Onwards we go.

Edited to say I can't be bothered wasting my time 'discussing' anything with people who are incapable of admitting they could ever be wrong and who will cherrypick the points which suit them and completely ignore the ones which challenge them.

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

beesrus wrote:

Tiger and greaser just cranking up their usual " the boss knows best " routine. Just salute the flag when it's raised up at the house.

Basra, I think Derek's track record on signings speaks for itself, so by all means you can keep to your agenda and I'll just stick to the facts if that's ok with you old bean.

Well, that's you told isn't it beesrus. Your opinions are just an agenda while graiser's are, apparently, facts. The arrogance of that statement.

The irony of graiser accusing others of having an agenda on a thread where, yet again, we've seen the same three posters flooding the thread (over 1/4 posts on this thread so far) as a team to defend their view. Which they are entitled to do, but FFS don't then accuse others of having an agenda.

Mr Mouse, its not an accusation to have an agenda, just stating an opinion, I'm really not fussed whether anybody agrees with mine or not but "the boss knows best" routine as it's been called, is one I've a high opinion of, because Derek does have a good track record in this department.

Graiser wrote:

Mr Mouse, its not an accusation to have an agenda, just stating an opinion,

Nonsense. Implied negativity. You're old enough to have a grasp of language.
The "boss didn't know best" on Thursday, did she ?    
Nasty people conspire, nice people plan. We all know that. Naughty man.

beesrus wrote:

Graiser wrote:

Mr Mouse, its not an accusation to have an agenda, just stating an opinion,

Nonsense. Implied negativity. You're old enough to have a grasp of language.
The "boss didn't know best" on Thursday, did she ?    
Nasty people conspire, nice people plan. We all know that. Naughty man.

You can put whatever take on it you wish, but why your referring to Theresa May god only knows, my comments are about Derek Adams.

Graiser wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

beesrus wrote:

Tiger and greaser just cranking up their usual " the boss knows best " routine. Just salute the flag when it's raised up at the house.

Basra, I think Derek's track record on signings speaks for itself, so by all means you can keep to your agenda and I'll just stick to the facts if that's ok with you old bean.

Well, that's you told isn't it beesrus. Your opinions are just an agenda while graiser's are, apparently, facts. The arrogance of that statement.

The irony of graiser accusing others of having an agenda on a thread where, yet again, we've seen the same three posters flooding the thread (over 1/4 posts on this thread so far) as a team to defend their view. Which they are entitled to do, but FFS don't then accuse others of having an agenda.

Mr Mouse, its not an accusation to have an agenda, just stating an opinion, I'm really not fussed whether anybody agrees with mine or not but "the boss knows best" routine as it's been called, is one I've a high opinion of, because Derek does have a good track record in this department.

It's really not worth even bothering with you, is it? Clearly it is an accusation to say that someone has an agenda, because it implies that they are not reacting to events/facts but that their opinion is predetermined. This is clearly a negative thing to say and an attempt to undermine what you pretend to defend (when it feckin suits you): the right to express an opinion. As beesrus says, you clearly know what language means. And you clearly are very fussed whether people agree with your opinion or agenda (you didn't make that clear...) otherwise you wouldn't be here constantly telling us that all is rosy.

There is just no point engaging with you, almost everything you write is in utterly bad faith. What you are doing is essentially trolling, kicking a wasp's nest then whining when you get stung. Pathetic.

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

beesrus wrote:

Tiger and greaser just cranking up their usual " the boss knows best " routine. Just salute the flag when it's raised up at the house.

Basra, I think Derek's track record on signings speaks for itself, so by all means you can keep to your agenda and I'll just stick to the facts if that's ok with you old bean.

Well, that's you told isn't it beesrus. Your opinions are just an agenda while graiser's are, apparently, facts. The arrogance of that statement.

The irony of graiser accusing others of having an agenda on a thread where, yet again, we've seen the same three posters flooding the thread (over 1/4 posts on this thread so far) as a team to defend their view. Which they are entitled to do, but FFS don't then accuse others of having an agenda.

Mr Mouse, its not an accusation to have an agenda, just stating an opinion, I'm really not fussed whether anybody agrees with mine or not but "the boss knows best" routine as it's been called, is one I've a high opinion of, because Derek does have a good track record in this department.

It's really not worth even bothering with you, is it? Clearly it is an accusation to say that someone has an agenda, because it implies that they are not reacting to events/facts but that their opinion is predetermined. This is clearly a negative thing to say and an attempt to undermine what you pretend to defend (when it feckin suits you): the right to express an opinion. As beesrus says, you clearly know what language means. And you clearly are very fussed whether people agree with your opinion or agenda (you didn't make that clear...) otherwise you wouldn't be here constantly telling us that all is rosy.

There is just no point engaging with you, almost everything you write is in utterly bad faith. What you are doing is essentially trolling, kicking a wasp's nest then whining when you get stung. Pathetic.

Tut tut Mr. Mouse that chip appears to be weighing pretty heavy on your shoulder.
On my agenda today is to finish painting my log cabin, i would call that a statement, whatever's on your agenda today I hope it works out for you but I don't see it as an accusation but never mind you have your interpretation and I have mine.
I feel free to express an opinion on ATD, what puzzles me is when it's contrary to other opinions all the accusations, allegations and vitriol comes forth from a few on board.
I fully understand that ATD is a Brent, PASOTi and IJN hating board and have no issue with that and if I want to have a pop at any of the above i will do, not because it's expected of me but because I'll have a gripe with them, equally if I want to post a positive post (as I Did with Derek) then I'll do exactly that in regard to ole Reuben being signed.
If you can't handle that then I respect your suggestion of not engaging with me.

Graiser wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

beesrus wrote:

Tiger and greaser just cranking up their usual " the boss knows best " routine. Just salute the flag when it's raised up at the house.

Basra, I think Derek's track record on signings speaks for itself, so by all means you can keep to your agenda and I'll just stick to the facts if that's ok with you old bean.

Well, that's you told isn't it beesrus. Your opinions are just an agenda while graiser's are, apparently, facts. The arrogance of that statement.

The irony of graiser accusing others of having an agenda on a thread where, yet again, we've seen the same three posters flooding the thread (over 1/4 posts on this thread so far) as a team to defend their view. Which they are entitled to do, but FFS don't then accuse others of having an agenda.

Mr Mouse, its not an accusation to have an agenda, just stating an opinion, I'm really not fussed whether anybody agrees with mine or not but "the boss knows best" routine as it's been called, is one I've a high opinion of, because Derek does have a good track record in this department.

It's really not worth even bothering with you, is it? Clearly it is an accusation to say that someone has an agenda, because it implies that they are not reacting to events/facts but that their opinion is predetermined. This is clearly a negative thing to say and an attempt to undermine what you pretend to defend (when it feckin suits you): the right to express an opinion. As beesrus says, you clearly know what language means. And you clearly are very fussed whether people agree with your opinion or agenda (you didn't make that clear...) otherwise you wouldn't be here constantly telling us that all is rosy.

There is just no point engaging with you, almost everything you write is in utterly bad faith. What you are doing is essentially trolling, kicking a wasp's nest then whining when you get stung. Pathetic.

Tut tut Mr. Mouse that chip appears to be weighing pretty heavy on your shoulder.
On my agenda today is to finish painting my log cabin, i would call that a statement, whatever's on your agenda today I hope it works out for you but I don't see it as an accusation but never mind you have your interpretation and I have mine.
I feel free to express an opinion on ATD, what puzzles me is when it's contrary to other opinions all the accusations, allegations and vitriol comes forth from a few on board.
I fully understand that ATD is a Brent, PASOTi and IJN hating board and have no issue with that and if I want to have a pop at any of the above i will do, not because it's expected of me but because I'll have a gripe with them, equally if I want to post a positive post (as I Did with Derek) then I'll do exactly that in regard to ole Reuben being signed.
If you can't handle that then I respect your suggestion of not engaging with me.

Bullshit and bad faith. Clearly you didn't mean agenda as in schedule in your response to beesrus. Why try to weasel out of it rather than take responsibility for what you meant?

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

charleymouse wrote:

Graiser wrote:

beesrus wrote:

Tiger and greaser just cranking up their usual " the boss knows best " routine. Just salute the flag when it's raised up at the house.

Basra, I think Derek's track record on signings speaks for itself, so by all means you can keep to your agenda and I'll just stick to the facts if that's ok with you old bean.

Well, that's you told isn't it beesrus. Your opinions are just an agenda while graiser's are, apparently, facts. The arrogance of that statement.

The irony of graiser accusing others of having an agenda on a thread where, yet again, we've seen the same three posters flooding the thread (over 1/4 posts on this thread so far) as a team to defend their view. Which they are entitled to do, but FFS don't then accuse others of having an agenda.

Mr Mouse, its not an accusation to have an agenda, just stating an opinion, I'm really not fussed whether anybody agrees with mine or not but "the boss knows best" routine as it's been called, is one I've a high opinion of, because Derek does have a good track record in this department.

It's really not worth even bothering with you, is it? Clearly it is an accusation to say that someone has an agenda, because it implies that they are not reacting to events/facts but that their opinion is predetermined. This is clearly a negative thing to say and an attempt to undermine what you pretend to defend (when it feckin suits you): the right to express an opinion. As beesrus says, you clearly know what language means. And you clearly are very fussed whether people agree with your opinion or agenda (you didn't make that clear...) otherwise you wouldn't be here constantly telling us that all is rosy.

There is just no point engaging with you, almost everything you write is in utterly bad faith. What you are doing is essentially trolling, kicking a wasp's nest then whining when you get stung. Pathetic.

Tut tut Mr. Mouse that chip appears to be weighing pretty heavy on your shoulder.
On my agenda today is to finish painting my log cabin, i would call that a statement, whatever's on your agenda today I hope it works out for you but I don't see it as an accusation but never mind you have your interpretation and I have mine.
I feel free to express an opinion on ATD, what puzzles me is when it's contrary to other opinions all the accusations, allegations and vitriol comes forth from a few on board.
I fully understand that ATD is a Brent, PASOTi and IJN hating board and have no issue with that and if I want to have a pop at any of the above i will do, not because it's expected of me but because I'll have a gripe with them, equally if I want to post a positive post (as I Did with Derek) then I'll do exactly that in regard to ole Reuben being signed.
If you can't handle that then I respect your suggestion of not engaging with me.

Bullshit and bad faith. Clearly you didn't mean agenda as in schedule in your response to beesrus. Why try to weasel out of it rather than take responsibility for what you meant?

Mouser, Does your post mean we're still engaging ?

I object strongly to my post being included in this bickering pasotiesque "terracing". It's hardly rude or anything really, just posters rubbing up against each other.
I detect the deft hand of someone who feels more able to exert influence, now the number of mods has been reduced. Can't think who it could be

beesrus wrote:

I object strongly to my post being included in this bickering pasotiesque "terracing". It's hardly rude or anything really, just posters rubbing up against each other.
I detect the deft hand of someone who feels more able to exert influence, now the number of mods has been reduced. Can't think who it could be  

As with all cases of bickering such as this , to move the posts was a collective decision by the mod team.

Would an explanation have been given if beesrus hadn't taken issue? I've no real problem with off piste slanging matches being moved to a 'handbags' thread but would appreciate a heads up to the members asap to avoid any confusion/suspicion.

Les Miserable wrote:

Would an explanation have been given if beesrus hadn't taken issue? I've no real problem with off piste slanging matches being moved to a 'handbags' thread but would appreciate a heads up to the members asap to avoid any confusion/suspicion.

Fair comment. We'll explain in future.

I don't hate Brent; nor do I trust him.

I don't hate Pasoti; completely oblivious to it really.

I don't hate Newell; he doesn't deserve that much consideration.

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I don't hate Brent; nor do I trust him.

I don't hate Pasoti; completely oblivious to it really.

I don't hate Newell; he doesn't deserve that much consideration.

He speaks highly of you mate!

Charleymouse has self deleted.

seadog wrote:

Charleymouse has self deleted.

BBC1 wrote:

Sir Francis Drake wrote:

I don't hate Brent; nor do I trust him.

I don't hate Pasoti; completely oblivious to it really.

I don't hate Newell; he doesn't deserve that much consideration.

He speaks highly of you mate!

I'm sure he does.

I liked your input on here Charley, so sorry to see you go, but if people irritate you too much, or some input is just unacceptable, no point in spending time with it. There's plenty of other vistas.
Divorce is just a healthy pruning, usually best done at the dormant time of year when the dead wood just gets in the way and looks and feels a bit..... well..... eughhh.

At the end of the day it's only a football forum.....out of season.....no one actually dies.

I blame the bored.

I'm free to bore my well-bought friends,
And spend my cash until the end,
'cause I'm bored!
I'm bored!
I'm the chairman of the board

Iggy's back!