Very difficult to deduce whether it's Brent, Starnes or Adams that has left this club with such a miserly employment regime that is champing at the bit to introduce a Steinbeck grapes of wrath regime. Just how is a club ethic supposed to emerge from such contracts ?
Is the same policy applied to the back room, management staff, etc or is the idea of performance pay just a football thing ? Will Hallett not receive his interest payments if his asset building doesn't come up to the mark ?
It just gets worse under the thumbscrews of Brent and Hallett. How can any self respecting footballer who is in demand at their level accept such conditions ? No wonder Purrington decided he would rather work for a relegation club than a promoted Argyle.